Ex-parte against director Vivek Agnihotri for comments against high court judge-Harlamha News





The Delhi High Court on Monday proceeded ex-parte against filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri, scientist Anand Ranganathan, and mag and information portal Swarajya as no person gave the impression for them in reference to a 2018 suo motu contempt case. 

Right through the process the listening to, a bench of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Amit Sharma famous that none a number of the 3 gave the impression ahead of the court regardless of issuing notices. Accordingly, the court proceeded with the listening to and indexed it for additional listening to on March 16.

The case is in reference to their remarks against high court Justice S. Muralidhar who had quashed rights activist Gautam Navlakha’s space arrest order and transit remand within the Bhima Koregaon case in 2018. Within the earlier listening to on Would possibly 4, additionally the court had famous the absence of the trio within the remaining couple of hearings whilst serving notices to them.

As in step with the case, the suo motu contempt lawsuits have been initiated against the respondents following RSS ideologue S. Gurumurthy’s tweets alleging bias via Justice Muralidhar. In his tweet, he retweeted the hyperlink from a weblog referred to as ‘Drishtikone’ which had a piece of writing titled ‘Why has Delhi High Court Justice Muralidhar’s dating with Gautam Navlakha now not been disclosed?’ 

The court took understand of the tweet and the item after Suggest Rajshekhar Rao wrote a letter to then Leader Justice Rajendra Menon, alleging that the item and Gurumurthy’s retweet used to be a planned try to assault a sitting High Court pass judgement on. Gurumurthy used to be later dropped from the case after an apology however others together with Agnihotri and Ranganathan are nonetheless the respondents.

Previous additionally, a contempt understand used to be despatched to Vivek Agnihotri over his tweets that mentioned that Gautam Navlakha used to be proven leniency over the truth that he used to be a pal of the pass judgement on’s spouse.





Source link

Posted on

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.